Losing Zinc metal in Macromolecule when converting to PDBQT

Python Prescription - Virtual Screening Tool

Re: Losing Zinc metal in Macromolecule when converting to PD

Postby Niek » Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:51 pm

I am trying to solve a similar problem, but this time with a metal (Fe) in the ligand instead of in the macromolecule. I have tried changing HETATM to ATOM (as suggested above), but that didn't help. Because the ligand does not include a definition of "chains", I can't really put the metal into the chain. The odd thing is that if I use K (which is not supported if I understand things right), this atom type is included correctly and I can dock without problems. Is there a generally working solution for keeping metals when going PDB -> PDBQT?
User avatar
Niek
Millimolar User
Millimolar User
 
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2010 2:43 pm

Re: Losing Zinc metal in Macromolecule when converting to PD

Postby sargis » Fri Oct 22, 2010 8:17 pm

Niek wrote:I am trying to solve a similar problem, but this time with a metal (Fe) in the ligand instead of in the macromolecule. I have tried changing HETATM to ATOM (as suggested above), but that didn't help. Because the ligand does not include a definition of "chains", I can't really put the metal into the chain. The odd thing is that if I use K (which is not supported if I understand things right), this atom type is included correctly and I can dock without problems. Is there a generally working solution for keeping metals when going PDB -> PDBQT?

Could you please attach a sample ligand file so that we can reproduce this? I just tried the following compound from PubChem and it worked fine for me:
http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/summary ... cid=115140

I did OpenBable energy minimization, since PubChem didn't have 3D SDF for this molecule. As you can see in the attached PDBQT, it kept the metal (Fe) and autogrid did generate Fe.map files for this.
Attachments
115140_mmff94_E=-71.95.pdbqt
(2.31 KiB) Downloaded 81 times
User avatar
sargis
Site Admin
Site Admin
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:39 pm

Re: Losing Zinc metal in Macromolecule when converting to PD

Postby sagarriya » Thu Mar 22, 2012 4:49 pm

you people are editing charge by opening the pdbqt file from plain note pad or Word, isn't it? I did same for my ligand 1C3S but it said "charges are not intregal, correct "this" residues by "this" value" . Now what to do? Which atom of that residue to correct by this value? I changed every atom of that residue but then it again said some other ligand had causing non integral charges. why isn't there a detailed tutorial about charge correction in receptor?
User avatar
sagarriya
Micromolar User
Micromolar User
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Thu Mar 01, 2012 5:50 pm

Previous

Return to PyRx

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

cron