The Molecular Graphics Laboratory Forum

AutoDock, AutoLigand, MGLTools, Vina, PyRx and more.
It is currently Mon Jul 16, 2018 11:57 pm

All times are UTC

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Cluster version ?
PostPosted: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:18 am 
Millimolar User
Millimolar User
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 24, 2009 6:05 am
Posts: 1
Hello everybody,

I am >very< new to docking simulations and happy that Autodock-Vina is so
simple to use, and indeed it does result in rigid-body docks in a very short

However, I have some questions and this far I could not find any resource to
look for the answer.

1. It is my feeling that the search space should be of comparable size to
the ligand? But does it have to be in every direction?
2. I am working with a polymeric ligand of nearly 5kDa that extends to size
of ~70Å – as you can guess the search space is becoming rather large and
computation does take rather long.
3. Is there a version of Autodock-Vina that is compatible with a
‘Beowulf’-kind cluster. We have combined 21 DualCore Systems (2 cores + HT)
with MosX. It would be great if one could run Vina on 80 cores instead of 8.
Maybe there is beta version or a version that could be compiled to work on
such a cluster?
4. If Autodock-Vina is not capable to do that – what are your suggestions to
try instead?

After those technical questions I have some nasty general questions:

How can you tell how reliable a solution is? For some of my dockings I can
tell from homology to crystal structures. But what if there is nothing you
can compare it to? How much do calculations benefit from flexible
sidechains? I reckon that it improves ‘reliability’ a lot but the cost is
computation time. So how do you balance it? The optimal case would certainly
be to leave all sidechains flexible, but that takes forever. Next aproach is
to leave only those in a binding area flexible – but sometimes that affected
the results unexpectedly ...

Kind regards.


 Post subject: Re: Cluster version ?
PostPosted: Thu Jun 25, 2009 1:02 am 
MGL member
MGL member
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 20, 2008 9:39 pm
Posts: 202
Is there a version of Autodock-Vina that is compatible with a
‘Beowulf’-kind cluster. shows examples of using a Beowulf cluster for virtual screening.

Taking advantage of cluster parallelism while docking a single ligand isn't supported.

If you don't get your question answered here, consider posting it on the AutoDock mailing list instead of this forum. Please do not email or PM me with requests for help.

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 2 posts ] 

All times are UTC

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Translated by Maël Soucaze © 2009